StoxGud Sign in

Gujarat Fluorochemicals vs Acutaas Chemicals: share price & financials comparison

NSE: FLUOROCHEM vs ACUTAAS · Chemicals · as of 13 Nov 2026

Gujarat FluorochemicalsNSE: FLUOROCHEM₹4,712.10 -2.12%Bullish setup · 7/10vsAcutaas ChemicalsNSE: ACUTAAS₹4,039.10 +1.08%Bullish setup · 8/10

Both prices rebased to 100 at the start of the selected period.

Gujarat Fluorochemicals vs Acutaas Chemicals at a glance

Gujarat Fluorochemicals (FLUOROCHEM) has a market capitalisation of ₹51,833 Cr, against ₹33,069 Cr for Acutaas Chemicals (ACUTAAS). Over the past year Acutaas Chemicals has returned +120.2%, compared with +28.1% for Gujarat Fluorochemicals. On valuation, Acutaas Chemicals trades at a lower P/E of 75.3 versus 76.3. Acutaas Chemicals earns a higher return on equity (23.6% vs 8.1%). Gujarat Fluorochemicals comes out ahead on size and valuation. Acutaas Chemicals comes out ahead on profitability, growth, financial health, momentum and technicals. Across the scored metrics below, Gujarat Fluorochemicals leads on 4 and Acutaas Chemicals on 13. On StoxGud's 10-point checklist, Gujarat Fluorochemicals scores 7/10 and Acutaas Chemicals scores 8/10.

MetricGujarat FluorochemicalsAcutaas Chemicals
Size
Market cap₹51,833 Cr₹33,069 Cr
Revenue (latest FY)₹4,996 Cr₹1,339 Cr
Net profit (latest FY)₹578 Cr₹356 Cr
Valuation
P/E76.375.3
P/B6.1817.80
Dividend yield0.06%0.04%
Profitability
Return on equity8.1%23.6%
Net profit margin11.6%27.6%
Operating margin25.4%39.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (YoY)+45.5%+42.7%
Net profit growth (YoY)+35.8%+73.3%
Revenue CAGR (multi-year)+13.5%+26.7%
Financial health
Debt to equity0.270.00
Momentum
1-month return+3.5%+27.1%
1-year return+28.1%+120.2%
3-year CAGR+18.7%+95.5%
5-year CAGR+17.7%+52.3%
Distance from 52W high-2.3%+0.0%
Technicals
RSI (14)7179
Price vs 200-day avg+19.9%+38.5%

Highlighted cells lead on that metric. Market cap, revenue and RSI are shown for context and not scored.

10-point checklist side by side

CheckGujarat FluorochemicalsAcutaas Chemicals
Price above 50-day average✓✓
Price above 200-day average✓✓
50-day average above 200-day (uptrend)✓✓
RSI in healthy 40–70 zone✗✗
Positive 1-year return✓✓
Return on equity above 15%✗✓
Debt to equity below 1✓✓
Revenue growing year on year✓✓
Net profit margin above 10%✓✓
P/E below industry median✗✗
Score7/108/10

A rules-based screen for education only — not a buy or sell recommendation.

FAQs

Which is bigger, Gujarat Fluorochemicals or Acutaas Chemicals?

Gujarat Fluorochemicals has a market cap of ₹51,833 Cr and Acutaas Chemicals has a market cap of ₹33,069 Cr as of 13 Nov 2026.

Which has a lower P/E, Gujarat Fluorochemicals or Acutaas Chemicals?

Acutaas Chemicals has the lower P/E: Gujarat Fluorochemicals trades at 76.3 and Acutaas Chemicals at 75.3.

Which gave better returns in the last year, Gujarat Fluorochemicals or Acutaas Chemicals?

Acutaas Chemicals did better: Gujarat Fluorochemicals returned +28.1% and Acutaas Chemicals returned +120.2% over one year.

What is the difference between Gujarat Fluorochemicals and Acutaas Chemicals?

Both are NSE-listed companies in Chemicals. Gujarat Fluorochemicals is about 1.6 times the size of Acutaas Chemicals by market cap. In the latest financial year Gujarat Fluorochemicals reported revenue of ₹4,996 Cr and Acutaas Chemicals ₹1,339 Cr. Operating margin is 25.4% for Gujarat Fluorochemicals and 39.1% for Acutaas Chemicals. Debt to equity is 0.27 for Gujarat Fluorochemicals and 0.00 for Acutaas Chemicals.

Which is better, Gujarat Fluorochemicals or Acutaas Chemicals?

It depends on what you are looking for, and StoxGud does not recommend either stock. On the metrics compared above, Gujarat Fluorochemicals leads on 4 and Acutaas Chemicals on 13. Gujarat Fluorochemicals is ahead on size and valuation. Acutaas Chemicals is ahead on profitability, growth, financial health, momentum and technicals. On StoxGud's rules-based checklist Gujarat Fluorochemicals scores 7/10 and Acutaas Chemicals scores 8/10. This is information, not advice: consult a SEBI-registered adviser before investing.

More comparisons