StoxSumitomo Chemical India vs Paradeep Phosphates: share price & financials comparison
NSE: SUMICHEM vs PARADEEP · Chemicals · as of 13 Nov 2026
Both prices rebased to 100 at the start of the selected period.
Sumitomo Chemical India vs Paradeep Phosphates at a glance
Sumitomo Chemical India (SUMICHEM) has a market capitalisation of ₹17,300 Cr, against ₹14,582 Cr for Paradeep Phosphates (PARADEEP). Over the past year Paradeep Phosphates has returned -16.5%, compared with -30.6% for Sumitomo Chemical India. Sumitomo Chemical India earns a higher return on equity (15.1% vs 0.0%). Sumitomo Chemical India comes out ahead on size, profitability and financial health. Paradeep Phosphates comes out ahead on valuation, growth, momentum and technicals. Across the scored metrics below, Sumitomo Chemical India leads on 5 and Paradeep Phosphates on 9. On StoxGud's 10-point checklist, Sumitomo Chemical India scores 5/10 and Paradeep Phosphates scores 4/10.
| Metric | Sumitomo Chemical India | Paradeep Phosphates |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | ₹17,300 Cr | ₹14,582 Cr |
| Revenue (latest FY) | ₹3,238 Cr | ₹21,826 Cr |
| Net profit (latest FY) | ₹543 Cr | ₹0 Cr |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.0 | — |
| P/B | 4.68 | 2.04 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.68% |
| Profitability | ||
| Return on equity | 15.1% | 0.0% |
| Net profit margin | 17.3% | 0.0% |
| Operating margin | 20.3% | 8.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2.4% | +7.2% |
| Net profit growth (YoY) | -11.5% | — |
| Revenue CAGR (multi-year) | +4.9% | +29.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt to equity | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Momentum | ||
| 1-month return | -16.3% | -1.0% |
| 1-year return | -30.6% | -16.5% |
| 3-year CAGR | -3.3% | +30.6% |
| 5-year CAGR | -1.3% | — |
| Distance from 52W high | -38.6% | -19.3% |
| Technicals | ||
| RSI (14) | 44 | 58 |
| Price vs 200-day avg | -22.2% | +4.3% |
Highlighted cells lead on that metric. Market cap, revenue and RSI are shown for context and not scored.
10-point checklist side by side
| Check | Sumitomo Chemical India | Paradeep Phosphates |
|---|---|---|
| Price above 50-day average | ✗ | ✗ |
| Price above 200-day average | ✗ | ✓ |
| 50-day average above 200-day (uptrend) | ✗ | ✓ |
| RSI in healthy 40–70 zone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Positive 1-year return | ✗ | ✗ |
| Return on equity above 15% | ✓ | ✗ |
| Debt to equity below 1 | ✓ | ✗ |
| Revenue growing year on year | ✗ | ✓ |
| Net profit margin above 10% | ✓ | ✗ |
| P/E below industry median | ✓ | ✗ |
| Score | 5/10 | 4/10 |
A rules-based screen for education only — not a buy or sell recommendation.
FAQs
Which is bigger, Sumitomo Chemical India or Paradeep Phosphates?
Sumitomo Chemical India has a market cap of ₹17,300 Cr and Paradeep Phosphates has a market cap of ₹14,582 Cr as of 13 Nov 2026.
Which gave better returns in the last year, Sumitomo Chemical India or Paradeep Phosphates?
Paradeep Phosphates did better: Sumitomo Chemical India returned -30.6% and Paradeep Phosphates returned -16.5% over one year.
What is the difference between Sumitomo Chemical India and Paradeep Phosphates?
Both are NSE-listed companies in Chemicals. Sumitomo Chemical India is about 1.2 times the size of Paradeep Phosphates by market cap. In the latest financial year Sumitomo Chemical India reported revenue of ₹3,238 Cr and Paradeep Phosphates ₹21,826 Cr. Operating margin is 20.3% for Sumitomo Chemical India and 8.6% for Paradeep Phosphates. Debt to equity is 0.00 for Sumitomo Chemical India and 1.38 for Paradeep Phosphates.
Which is better, Sumitomo Chemical India or Paradeep Phosphates?
It depends on what you are looking for, and StoxGud does not recommend either stock. On the metrics compared above, Sumitomo Chemical India leads on 5 and Paradeep Phosphates on 9. Sumitomo Chemical India is ahead on size, profitability and financial health. Paradeep Phosphates is ahead on valuation, growth, momentum and technicals. On StoxGud's rules-based checklist Sumitomo Chemical India scores 5/10 and Paradeep Phosphates scores 4/10. This is information, not advice: consult a SEBI-registered adviser before investing.