StoxRamkrishna Forgings vs Ceat: share price & financials comparison
NSE: RKFORGE vs CEATLTD · Automobile and Auto Components · as of 13 Nov 2026
Both prices rebased to 100 at the start of the selected period.
Ramkrishna Forgings vs Ceat at a glance
Ramkrishna Forgings (RKFORGE) has a market capitalisation of ₹14,533 Cr, against ₹3,312 Cr for Ceat (CEATLTD). Over the past year Ramkrishna Forgings has returned +46.9%, compared with -11.6% for Ceat. On valuation, Ceat trades at a lower P/E of 7.8 versus 77.7. Ceat earns a higher return on equity (8.6% vs 5.2%). Ramkrishna Forgings comes out ahead on profitability, growth, financial health, momentum and technicals. Ceat comes out ahead on size and valuation. Across the scored metrics below, Ramkrishna Forgings leads on 11 and Ceat on 6. On StoxGud's 10-point checklist, Ramkrishna Forgings scores 6/10 and Ceat scores 5/10.
| Metric | Ramkrishna Forgings | Ceat |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | ₹14,533 Cr | ₹3,312 Cr |
| Revenue (latest FY) | ₹4,238 Cr | ₹15,678 Cr |
| Net profit (latest FY) | ₹72 Cr | ₹698 Cr |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 77.7 | 7.8 |
| P/B | 4.04 | 0.67 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 3.66% |
| Profitability | ||
| Return on equity | 5.2% | 8.6% |
| Net profit margin | 3.8% | 2.4% |
| Operating margin | 17.1% | 11.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +54.9% | +26.2% |
| Net profit growth (YoY) | — | -86.0% |
| Revenue CAGR (multi-year) | +23.1% | +15.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt to equity | 0.61 | 0.78 |
| Momentum | ||
| 1-month return | +12.3% | +7.6% |
| 1-year return | +46.9% | -11.6% |
| 3-year CAGR | +4.0% | +18.8% |
| 5-year CAGR | +31.6% | +23.1% |
| 10-year CAGR | +29.3% | +11.1% |
| Distance from 52W high | -0.1% | -14.0% |
| Technicals | ||
| RSI (14) | 81 | 79 |
| Price vs 200-day avg | +28.2% | +1.6% |
Highlighted cells lead on that metric. Market cap, revenue and RSI are shown for context and not scored.
10-point checklist side by side
| Check | Ramkrishna Forgings | Ceat |
|---|---|---|
| Price above 50-day average | ✓ | ✓ |
| Price above 200-day average | ✓ | ✓ |
| 50-day average above 200-day (uptrend) | ✓ | ✗ |
| RSI in healthy 40–70 zone | ✗ | ✗ |
| Positive 1-year return | ✓ | ✗ |
| Return on equity above 15% | ✗ | ✗ |
| Debt to equity below 1 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Revenue growing year on year | ✓ | ✓ |
| Net profit margin above 10% | ✗ | ✗ |
| P/E below industry median | ✗ | ✓ |
| Score | 6/10 | 5/10 |
A rules-based screen for education only — not a buy or sell recommendation.
FAQs
Which is bigger, Ramkrishna Forgings or Ceat?
Ramkrishna Forgings has a market cap of ₹14,533 Cr and Ceat has a market cap of ₹3,312 Cr as of 13 Nov 2026.
Which has a lower P/E, Ramkrishna Forgings or Ceat?
Ceat has the lower P/E: Ramkrishna Forgings trades at 77.7 and Ceat at 7.8.
Which gave better returns in the last year, Ramkrishna Forgings or Ceat?
Ramkrishna Forgings did better: Ramkrishna Forgings returned +46.9% and Ceat returned -11.6% over one year.
What is the difference between Ramkrishna Forgings and Ceat?
Both are NSE-listed companies in Automobile and Auto Components. Ramkrishna Forgings is about 4.4 times the size of Ceat by market cap. In the latest financial year Ramkrishna Forgings reported revenue of ₹4,238 Cr and Ceat ₹15,678 Cr. Operating margin is 17.1% for Ramkrishna Forgings and 11.3% for Ceat. Debt to equity is 0.61 for Ramkrishna Forgings and 0.78 for Ceat.
Which is better, Ramkrishna Forgings or Ceat?
It depends on what you are looking for, and StoxGud does not recommend either stock. On the metrics compared above, Ramkrishna Forgings leads on 11 and Ceat on 6. Ramkrishna Forgings is ahead on profitability, growth, financial health, momentum and technicals. Ceat is ahead on size and valuation. On StoxGud's rules-based checklist Ramkrishna Forgings scores 6/10 and Ceat scores 5/10. This is information, not advice: consult a SEBI-registered adviser before investing.