StoxOracle Financial Services Software vs Fractal Analytics: share price & financials comparison
NSE: OFSS vs FRACTAL · Information Technology · as of 13 Nov 2026
Both prices rebased to 100 at the start of the selected period.
Oracle Financial Services Software vs Fractal Analytics at a glance
Oracle Financial Services Software (OFSS) has a market capitalisation of ₹86,433 Cr, against ₹14,456 Cr for Fractal Analytics (FRACTAL). On valuation, Oracle Financial Services Software trades at a lower P/E of 24.2 versus 38.5. Oracle Financial Services Software earns a higher return on equity (46.4% vs 11.0%). Oracle Financial Services Software comes out ahead on size and profitability. Across the scored metrics below, Oracle Financial Services Software leads on 6 and Fractal Analytics on 2. On StoxGud's 10-point checklist, Oracle Financial Services Software scores 8/10 and Fractal Analytics scores 3/10.
| Metric | Oracle Financial Services Software | Fractal Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | ₹86,433 Cr | ₹14,456 Cr |
| Revenue (latest FY) | ₹7,672 Cr | ₹3,300 Cr |
| Net profit (latest FY) | ₹2,639 Cr | ₹292 Cr |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.2 | 38.5 |
| P/B | 11.24 | 4.21 |
| Dividend yield | 3.97% | — |
| Profitability | ||
| Return on equity | 46.4% | 11.0% |
| Net profit margin | 39.4% | 10.4% |
| Operating margin | 51.6% | 16.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +6.6% | — |
| Net profit growth (YoY) | +28.6% | — |
| Revenue CAGR (multi-year) | +9.0% | — |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt to equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Momentum | ||
| 1-month return | -6.8% | +15.7% |
| 1-year return | +19.1% | — |
| 3-year CAGR | +35.3% | — |
| 5-year CAGR | +17.4% | — |
| 10-year CAGR | +12.4% | — |
| Distance from 52W high | -21.0% | -24.6% |
| Technicals | ||
| RSI (14) | 57 | 71 |
| Price vs 200-day avg | +3.6% | — |
Highlighted cells lead on that metric. Market cap, revenue and RSI are shown for context and not scored.
10-point checklist side by side
| Check | Oracle Financial Services Software | Fractal Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Price above 50-day average | ✗ | ✓ |
| Price above 200-day average | ✓ | ✗ |
| 50-day average above 200-day (uptrend) | ✓ | ✗ |
| RSI in healthy 40–70 zone | ✓ | ✗ |
| Positive 1-year return | ✓ | ✗ |
| Return on equity above 15% | ✓ | ✗ |
| Debt to equity below 1 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Revenue growing year on year | ✓ | ✗ |
| Net profit margin above 10% | ✓ | ✓ |
| P/E below industry median | ✗ | ✗ |
| Score | 8/10 | 3/10 |
A rules-based screen for education only — not a buy or sell recommendation.
FAQs
Which is bigger, Oracle Financial Services Software or Fractal Analytics?
Oracle Financial Services Software has a market cap of ₹86,433 Cr and Fractal Analytics has a market cap of ₹14,456 Cr as of 13 Nov 2026.
Which has a lower P/E, Oracle Financial Services Software or Fractal Analytics?
Oracle Financial Services Software has the lower P/E: Oracle Financial Services Software trades at 24.2 and Fractal Analytics at 38.5.
What is the difference between Oracle Financial Services Software and Fractal Analytics?
Both are NSE-listed companies in Information Technology. Oracle Financial Services Software is about 6.0 times the size of Fractal Analytics by market cap. In the latest financial year Oracle Financial Services Software reported revenue of ₹7,672 Cr and Fractal Analytics ₹3,300 Cr. Operating margin is 51.6% for Oracle Financial Services Software and 16.7% for Fractal Analytics. Debt to equity is 0.00 for Oracle Financial Services Software and 0.00 for Fractal Analytics.
Which is better, Oracle Financial Services Software or Fractal Analytics?
It depends on what you are looking for, and StoxGud does not recommend either stock. On the metrics compared above, Oracle Financial Services Software leads on 6 and Fractal Analytics on 2. Oracle Financial Services Software is ahead on size and profitability. On StoxGud's rules-based checklist Oracle Financial Services Software scores 8/10 and Fractal Analytics scores 3/10. This is information, not advice: consult a SEBI-registered adviser before investing.