StoxCoforge vs L&T Technology Services: share price & financials comparison
NSE: COFORGE vs LTTS · Information Technology · as of 13 Nov 2026
Both prices rebased to 100 at the start of the selected period.
Coforge vs L&T Technology Services at a glance
Coforge (COFORGE) has a market capitalisation of ₹89,840 Cr, against ₹45,020 Cr for L&T Technology Services (LTTS). Over the past year Coforge has returned +14.8%, compared with +3.8% for L&T Technology Services. On valuation, L&T Technology Services trades at a lower P/E of 29.2 versus 46.6. L&T Technology Services earns a higher return on equity (21.7% vs 8.6%). Coforge comes out ahead on size, growth, momentum and technicals. L&T Technology Services comes out ahead on valuation and profitability. Across the scored metrics below, Coforge leads on 11 and L&T Technology Services on 6. On StoxGud's 10-point checklist, Coforge scores 7/10 and L&T Technology Services scores 9/10.
| Metric | Coforge | L&T Technology Services |
|---|---|---|
| Size | ||
| Market cap | ₹89,840 Cr | ₹45,020 Cr |
| Revenue (latest FY) | ₹16,403 Cr | ₹10,996 Cr |
| Net profit (latest FY) | ₹1,566 Cr | ₹1,279 Cr |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 46.6 | 29.2 |
| P/B | 4.02 | 6.36 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 1.32% |
| Profitability | ||
| Return on equity | 8.6% | 21.7% |
| Net profit margin | 9.5% | 13.1% |
| Operating margin | 19.1% | 18.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +54.8% | +2.0% |
| Net profit growth (YoY) | +56.5% | +66.8% |
| Revenue CAGR (multi-year) | +28.6% | +15.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt to equity | 0.25 | 0.00 |
| Momentum | ||
| 1-month return | +5.1% | +23.9% |
| 1-year return | +14.8% | +3.8% |
| 3-year CAGR | +25.9% | -0.1% |
| 5-year CAGR | +13.0% | -4.4% |
| 10-year CAGR | +38.2% | +18.9% |
| Distance from 52W high | -3.4% | -9.6% |
| Technicals | ||
| RSI (14) | 66 | 68 |
| Price vs 200-day avg | +30.3% | +21.2% |
Highlighted cells lead on that metric. Market cap, revenue and RSI are shown for context and not scored.
10-point checklist side by side
| Check | Coforge | L&T Technology Services |
|---|---|---|
| Price above 50-day average | ✓ | ✓ |
| Price above 200-day average | ✓ | ✓ |
| 50-day average above 200-day (uptrend) | ✓ | ✓ |
| RSI in healthy 40–70 zone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Positive 1-year return | ✓ | ✓ |
| Return on equity above 15% | ✗ | ✓ |
| Debt to equity below 1 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Revenue growing year on year | ✓ | ✓ |
| Net profit margin above 10% | ✗ | ✓ |
| P/E below industry median | ✗ | ✗ |
| Score | 7/10 | 9/10 |
A rules-based screen for education only — not a buy or sell recommendation.
FAQs
Which is bigger, Coforge or L&T Technology Services?
Coforge has a market cap of ₹89,840 Cr and L&T Technology Services has a market cap of ₹45,020 Cr as of 13 Nov 2026.
Which has a lower P/E, Coforge or L&T Technology Services?
L&T Technology Services has the lower P/E: Coforge trades at 46.6 and L&T Technology Services at 29.2.
Which gave better returns in the last year, Coforge or L&T Technology Services?
Coforge did better: Coforge returned +14.8% and L&T Technology Services returned +3.8% over one year.
What is the difference between Coforge and L&T Technology Services?
Both are NSE-listed companies in Information Technology. Coforge is about 2.0 times the size of L&T Technology Services by market cap. In the latest financial year Coforge reported revenue of ₹16,403 Cr and L&T Technology Services ₹10,996 Cr. Operating margin is 19.1% for Coforge and 18.4% for L&T Technology Services. Debt to equity is 0.25 for Coforge and 0.00 for L&T Technology Services.
Which is better, Coforge or L&T Technology Services?
It depends on what you are looking for, and StoxGud does not recommend either stock. On the metrics compared above, Coforge leads on 11 and L&T Technology Services on 6. Coforge is ahead on size, growth, momentum and technicals. L&T Technology Services is ahead on valuation and profitability. On StoxGud's rules-based checklist Coforge scores 7/10 and L&T Technology Services scores 9/10. This is information, not advice: consult a SEBI-registered adviser before investing.